“I have been convicted of acting against the national security, spreading propaganda against the regime and keeping banned books at home“ Dadkhah told the Guardian from Tehran. (Source: Katherine Weber )
If we think freedom of speech is suppressed now, just wait until Islam gains a substantial foothold here. Or worse, becomes the new U.S. constitution. Talk to almost anyone in Europe to understand how inviting Islam changes the political climate and causes a myriad of social, economic, and public safety problems.
Consider this. Youcef would be dead right now, at the hands of his Islamic government, if it weren’t for the press and prayers he has received here in the states.
Yousef’s attorney getting arrested is now yet another vivid warning to all U.S. citizens who blindly think Islam is a relatively benign “religion of peace” like Christianity or Judaism. Actually, not just a violent religion, it is an aggressive governmental structure that is not at all compatible with the laws and lifestyle we have in the U.S.
So what is going on here? Why would this man come out so strong on this issue choosing a audience of impressionable teens? My primary answer is “ratings”. Nobody cares if he says this stuff in front of adults. They wouldn’t give him the time of day, or call him on his errors. But get a captive audience of children, then tape yourself intentionally beating them up verbally… now that will get you the front page. I believe that’s why he did this. No question.
But, to get back to the original question, let’s take the first answer first. “Actually we can [ignore him], He’s a low-life, intellectually dishonest, hypocrite.”
This is so very true. His ‘biblical arguments’ in the video above are obvious proof text segments from the Bible that don’t even make sense out of context. Read correctly, they simply don’t apply to anyone for various reasons. Christians aren’t ignoring them, they simply no longer apply. Any intelligent adult can refute his claims with one brain tied behind their back. So, he either knows his error very well, and therefore is being extremely intellectually dishonest (lying), or he really and truly doesn’t know what he’s talking about at all and therefore shouldn’t be setting himself up as an authority on the subject. Personally, I believe the first case. But either way, he shouldn’t be allowed to be around children.
In short, I think that Dan Savage actually knows his actions are very dishonest and was using this as an intimidation tactic to gain a national press presence. Therefore, his arguments, and his career for that matter, should and will be discredited and disregarded by any and all truly intellectual free thinkers.
Okay, on to the second answer: “We can’t [ignore him] because unfortunately he’s part of a growing strata of our society who are becoming highly aggressive, highly violent, and believe they can force their lack of morality on other people (in this case children).”
Well, time for the bad news. As far as I can see, this type of thing is only going to get worse. As society continues to cave to the bullying pressure of the violent segment of the homosexual movement, it will continue to get stronger.
I will reiterate what many have said before me… These people fain ‘tolerance’, but themselves are some of the most intolerant people on the planet. They cry foul and demand legislation when someone looks at them sideways, but then openly assault defenseless unsuspecting children for their political gain. It’s just hypocritical.
Don’t worry about him though. Dan will fare very well from this, be confident of that. He’s likely already receiving many checks in the mail from this media frenzy. And I don’t think this is the last time we’ll hear from Dan. I’m sure he has many more stunts like this up his sleeve.
One of the things that churns my stomach the most is blatant attempts to deceive the church. I don’t care if it’s travelling evangelists, TV preachers, pseudo-Christian music artists, etc. If a pastor’s goal is to deliberately pull a con on churchgoers, diluting the gospel in the process, I’m sorry – there’s just no excuse good enough. (Matt 18:6).
What’s the story? Well, to give the short version, Rev. Mike Guglielmucci faked having cancer over a 2 year time frame where he accepted huge offerings from huge churches for his “treatments”. In addition, he wrote the mega-hit worship song “Healer” which was featured on Hillsong’s “This is Our God” album in 2008. According to Wikipedia, when the scandal was exposed the song was stripped from the Hillsong album which was remixed and rereleased without the song.
When Mike was confronted and exposed, his primary excuse was “Pornography made be do it.” (See videos below.)
But my grievance in this post is not with Mike Guglielmucci himself (although what he did was awful). I’m actually more upset with all the churches all across the United States, and the world, who know the story behind the song and yet still continue to sing it in church. It’s just jaw-dropping.
The church my family and I currently attend is one of the seemingly millions of congregations that are still singing this song on a regular basis. It really bugs me. Every time the music start up and the words come on the screen I get this sick feeling in my core. I immediately think “Mike is probably smiling right now as he’s cashing another one of his fat royalty checks.”
There are two main reasons (“Excuses”) why people still sing this song even though they are fully aware of its origins and this controversy.
“The words are so good, we can just overlook the source”
“Everybody makes mistakes, Mike is only human”
“The words are so good, we can just overlook the source” – I guess my response would be like this. Should we start writing Christian worship songs based on “good passages” in the quran? Of course not! That would be a huge mistake. “Good words” is not good enough. The source IS important. As I’ve asked before, would we serve to our dinner guests water glasses filled with water from the toilet? Absolutely NOT! The source is extremely important. So it is with worship. Even if the words are good, love songs written by drug induced or satanic influence should not be used in Christian worship. And neither should songs written for the express purpose of deceiving the church body.
“Everybody makes mistakes, Mike is only human” – No, I’m sorry, a mistake is “oops, I accidentally spent children’s fund money on repainting the baptismal.” An elaborate 2 year scam that soaked believers of possibly millions of dollars in donations and song royalties is NOT a simple “mistake”.
The Friend Robber
OK, here’s the real likeness. Imagine one of your friends came up to you out of nowhere and offered to give you $2000. You instantly respond by saying “Of course! Give me the money.” But soon you get curious and ask “Wait a minute, where did all this money come from?” As it turns out your friend somehow obtained the account and pin numbers for the bank accounts of all your other friends. Over time, he was able to extract thousands from the accounts and now just wants to share some of the cash with you.
Well, the above scenario is bad. Very bad. If you were a decent friend and human you would at very least say “Wait. That’s deceptive and wrong. I want no part of this.” So it is with “Healer”. it was created and funded under extremely scandalous circumstances and with malicious intent. The Body of Christ has been and is being damaged by this act. So why, why, why, why, why, why are we still singing this song in church?
Watch the Videos
While you’re Watching this video, think about the fact that this guy isn’t actually sick. (And try not to get sick yourself.)
Here’s a news story about the scandal.
The Big Question.
Can Mr. Guglielmucci be saved? Sure, Paul was saved and he even killed Christians in his early years. If Mike has repented before God… we very well may see him in Heaven. And I will be very happy to see that happen. But that’s still not a good enough reason to reward his actions here on earth by singing his song in our churches. There are many other great songs about healing. Please pick a different one.
Your Response
What do you think? Am I missing something here? Comment below and let me know what you think.
sending...